So suggests new research that tracked changes in two genes thought to help regulate brain growth, changes that appeared well after the rise of modern humans , years ago. That the defining feature of humans — our large brains — continued to evolve as recently as 5, years ago, and may be doing so today, promises to surprise the average person, if not biologists. Lahn and colleagues examined two genes, named microcephalin and ASPM, that are connected to brain size. If those genes don’t work, babies are born with severely small brains, called microcephaly. Using DNA samples from ethnically diverse populations, they identified a collection of variations in each gene that occurred with unusually high frequency. In fact, the variations were so common they couldn’t be accidental mutations but instead were probably due to natural selection, where genetic changes that are favorable to a species quickly gain a foothold and begin to spread, the researchers report. Lahn offers an analogy: Medieval monks would copy manuscripts and each copy would inevitably contain errors — accidental mutations. Years later, a ruler declares one of those copies the definitive manuscript, and a rush is on to make many copies of that version — so whatever changes from the original are in this presumed important copy become widely disseminated. Scientists attempt to date genetic changes by tracing back to such spread, using a statistical model that assumes genes have a certain mutation rate over time.
Carbon-14 Dating Does Not Disprove the Bible
Outlook Other Abstract U-Pb radioisotope dating is now the absolute dating method of first choice among geochronologists, especially using the mineral zircon. A variety of analytical instruments have also now been developed using different micro-sampling techniques coupled with mass spectrometers, thus enabling wide usage of U-Pb radioisotope dating.
However, problems remain in the interpretation of the measured Pb isotopic ratios to transform them into ages.
Experience the life-size Noah’s Ark! Ark Encounter is a one-of-a-kind themed attraction the whole family will enjoy, located in Williamstown, Kentucky.
Donate Book of Genesis Author: The author of the Book of Genesis is not identified. Traditionally, the author has always assumed to have been Moses. There is no conclusive reason to deny the Mosaic authorship of Genesis. The Book of Genesis does not state when it was written. The date of authorship is likely between and B. The Book of Genesis has sometimes been called the “seed-plot” of the entire Bible. Most of the major doctrines in the Bible are introduced in “seed” form in the Book of Genesis.
Along with the fall of man, God’s promise of salvation or redemption is recorded Genesis 3: The doctrines of creation, imputation of sin, justification, atonement, depravity, wrath, grace, sovereignty, responsibility, and many more are all addressed in this book of origins called Genesis. Many of the great questions of life are answered in Genesis.
God created us – Genesis 1:
THE GENESIS GV80
Chapters 1—11 provide an introduction to the Book of Genesis, the Pentateuch, and the whole Bible. First, the author intends to draw a line connecting the God of the Fathers and the God of the Sinai covenant with the God who created the world. Second, the author intends to show that the call of the patriarchs and the Sinai covenant have as their ultimate goal the reestablishment of God’s original purpose in Creation. At any rate, various ‘origin stories’ or ‘creation myths’ about the activities of a variety of creator-gods are still extant in what remains of the literatures of ancient Egypt and ancient Mesopotamia.
But the combination of such accounts with narratives about more recent times testifies to an additional motivation.
Ang Dating Biblia — Philippines Bible Society (), Tagalog (Philippines National Language) — Bible is Recognized by its Title (Ang Biblia) or (Ang Dating Biblia) — Typed From the Ang Biblia Tagalog, by Richard und Dolores Long.
The Date of Noah’s Flood: Literary and Archaeological Evidence by Dr. David Livingston Considerable interest in the Flood has been generated by recent attempts to find the Ark in the Mt. Ararat area of easternmost Turkey. At the same time, those who date the Flood within known Near Eastern ancient history – about BC – have long been derided by many Bible scholars. Even some who believe the Bible to be historically true feel the date cannot be later than 10, – 12, BC, placing it well beyond the reach of any related archaeological or literary data for which dates are known.
Shop Now Scientists use a technique called radiometric dating to estimate the ages of rocks, fossils, and the earth. Many people have been led to believe that radiometric dating methods have proved the earth to be billions of years old. With our focus on one particular form of radiometric dating—carbon dating—we will see that carbon dating strongly supports a young earth.
Note that, contrary to a popular misconception, carbon dating is not used to date rocks at millions of years old.
Truly free Christian dating, friendship and forum site to meet Christian singles and married people alike. Completely free up to 10 emails sent per day with unlimited incoming mail, searching and other use. Feel at ease to share in our conservative Christian political discussion forums, where the right to speak what’s on your mind will almost always take priority over letting moderators.
The Three Bible Timelines: The Masoretic text had an unbroken history of careful transcription for centuries. Most people who try to compute a Bible timeline are faced with the same dilemmas. Professor James Barr, a Scottish Old Testament scholar, has identified three distinct periods that Ussher, and all biblical chronologists had to tackle: Find out more now! Anyone who starts out reading the Bible with Genesis, as many people do, can easily compute the years from Adam to Solomon.
The key male players are all linked with genealogies and ages. The Masoretic text and the Septuagint both link all the key male players, but the Septuagint gives longer time frames for many of them. Now we have gaps in the record.
Book of Genesis
Comparative mythology provides historical and cross-cultural perspectives for Jewish mythology. Both sources behind the Genesis creation narrative borrowed themes from Mesopotamian mythology ,   but adapted them to their belief in one God ,  establishing a monotheistic creation in opposition to the polytheistic creation myth of ancient Israel’s neighbors. Both begin with a series of statements of what did not exist at the moment when creation began; the Enuma Elish has a spring in the sea as the point where creation begins, paralleling the spring on the land — Genesis 2 is notable for being a “dry” creation story in Genesis 2: At the same time, and as with Genesis 1, the Jewish version has drastically changed its Babylonian model:
Dating creation is the attempt to provide an estimate of the age of Earth or the age of the universe as understood through the origin myths of various religious s traditional beliefs held that Planet Earth, or the entire Universe, was brought into being in a grand creation event by one or more these cultures developed calendars, many began to ponder the question of.
Exploring the wonders of geology in response to young-Earth claims Please read my guidelines and background posts before proceeding! The reason is that AiG authors do not simply try and persuade their readers to discount this method as wholly unreliable even when the ages obtained exceed 10, years but actually present the results as positive evidence for a young Earth. In doing so, I will consider their use of sources from scientific literature , their understanding of the method itself, and the assumptions that go into their reasoning for why these ages commonly more than 10, years B.
Why the focus on C? However, this is not out of ignorance on anyone’s part. The radiocarbon method is often used as a starting point for understanding radiometric dating techniques, especially in classes unrelated to geology, because: The third point is most relevant to our discussion, since it results in ‘both sides’ affirming the accuracy of radiocarbon dating for any ‘recent’ samples as opposed to nearly any other method, which must be discounted in all cases by anyone that believes in a young Earth.
Thus even from a ‘young-Earth’ standpoint, all radiocarbon dates assuming that care is taken to eliminate contamination are taken to be meaningful indicators of a given sample’s age. Hasn’t the issue already been settled? Anyone familiar with typical studies employing the radiocarbon method knows that model ages obtained often exceed 10, years e.
So doesn’t the method already affirm that the Earth or at least it’s now deceased inhabitants must be at least this old? The article begins with a simplified explanation of the radiocarbon method.
Genesis and Genetics
The term “Hebrew” is generally used to describe the Old Testament patriarchs, beginning with Abraham and Isaac and ending with Moses, and to designate a period covering approximately years dating from the first half of the second millennium BCE to the conquest in the 13th century BCE of Canaan Palestine that followed the exodus from Egypt during the reign of Ramesses II BCE. From the 13th century to the time of the Babylonian Captivity in the 6th century BCE, the same people are known as Israelites.
After their return from Babylon, they are known as Jews. Properly speaking, it is only after the conquest of Canaan in the 13th century that “Hebrews” are speaking Hebrew, which was a dialect of Canaanite, a Semitic language heavily influenced by Egyptian and spoken in the kingdoms of Israel, Judah, and Moab between and BCE. For religious reasons, Hebrew is often treated as a distinct language.
The semi-nomadic Hebrew tribes led by Joshua that conquered Caanan in the 13th century lived in a pre-state society.
As a federally recognized (c)(3) nonprofit ministry of the USA, all gifts to ICR are completely tax deductible to the fullest extent allowed by U.S. law.
Here are some of the places he lived. More recent scholars, however, beginning with Cyrus Gordon, have expressed doubt about this southern location for Ur: Sumerian Ur is never called “Ur of the Chaldeans” in hundreds of references in cuneiform texts. The Chaldeans were related to the Arameans, and didn’t penetrate the area of southern Mesopotamia until about BC.
An Elba tablet refers to “Ur in Haran. Migrations from southern Mesopotamia accord with records of migrations of Amorites into Babylonia from the end of the third millennium BC onward. We also know of the very strong religious connection between Sumerian Ur and Haran. Whatever the actual location of “Ur of the Chaldeans,” it doesn’t matter to the story of Abraham obeying God’s call.
Haran The site of Haran, a strategic city in ancient times, lies along the Jullab River, near the source of the Balikh River, 24 miles southeast of the Turkish city Urfa, and 60 miles north of the confluence of the Euphrates and Balikh Rivers. It is located on the main road that ran from Nineveh to Carchemish and was regarded of considerable importance by the Assyrian kings.
Its chief cult was that of the Mesopotamian moon-god Sin.
Andrew Snelling, Geologist
Sheely Proposes a Solution Paul H. I agree with him on many points, especially his perceptive and sound arguments against Young-Earth Creationism. In addition it finds evidence in Scripture for items which Old Testament scholars do not find there, like multiple volcanoes exploding at the time of the flood.
Anthropology’s first man must be dated before Neolithic times; the literal man of Genesis 2 and 3 must be dated in Neolithic times. The legitimate use of anthropology resolves the conflict by leading to the recognition that Adam is a figurative person, who harmonizes with both anthropology and biblical theology. Introduction The Bible says Luke 3:
You have a lot of Neanderthal DNA. At least percent of your DNA is identical to Neanderthal Recent DNA sequencing is revealing the truth of Neanderthal, and it is time to bury all our preconceived ideas about him and start afresh allowing DNA to be our guide.
Academic Institution Partnership Hydrogeological Survey of Somalia Despite groundwater being the main source of water for humans, agriculture and livestock, there is neither a hydrogeological map nor a sound policy for groundwater management and exploration in Somalia. SWALIM undertook a quantitative and updated assessment of the groundwater resources of Somaliland and Puntland and the set-up of a system for groundwater level monitoring. Read more Supporting sustainable water resource management The development of new groundwater sources in Somalia is fraught with challenges.
Read more Sustainable water use Water is Life! SWALIM project has developed systems for monitoring surface and groundwater in Somalia to support planning, development and sustainable exploitation of the scarce and valuable water resources in the country. SWALIM seeks to strengthen these three dimensions together in order to put in place a viable capability for sustainable water and land resource management within Somali institutions.
Up-to-date Information about these resources ensures informed decisions on their management and utilization, subsequently guaranteeing they will remain for the welfare of future generations. Information extracted from satellite images are essential for informed land planning, consistent natural resources assessment, disaster early warning and management, and other tasks.
The Three Bible Timelines: Why and How They Differ
DNA , Neanderthal , Who is Neanderthal admin This blog presents several additional points to support the notion that Neanderthal is antediluvian man, i. In , we presented evidence, based on partial mitochondrial DNA sequences, that Neanderthal is indeed our direct, antediluvian ancestor 1. We now have more evidence that solidifies our position. More and more they are being portrayed as fully human like us.
THE TOWER OF BABEL AND THE CONFUSION OF LANGUAGES. by Lambert Dolphin. The building of the Tower of Babel and the Confusion of Tongues (languages) in ancient Babylon is mentioned rather briefly in Genesis Chapters 10 and
Even many evolutionists ruefully admit that this charge is undeniable with regard to the circularity invoked in dating rock layers. Some of the following quotes are as cited in Morris, and Snelling, The series of quotes begins with a vivid illustration of this circular reasoning in action. The age of rocks may be determined by the fossils found in them. This time interval was from million years ago.
Strangely, little effort has been made to test this assumption. This failure leaves the method vulnerable to circularity. Scientists have determined the relative times of appearance and disappearance of many kinds of organisms from the location of their fossils within the sedimentary rock layers. It is almost the first thing I teach my first-year students. Ever since William Smith at the beginning of the 19th century, fossils have been and still are the best and most accurate method of dating and correlating the rocks in which they occur.
The vertical sequence of fossils is thought to represent a process because the enclosing rocks are interpreted as a process. The rocks do date the fossils, but the fossils date the rocks more accurately.
Language tree rooted in Turkey
In Articles , Featured , Science and Technology by JD Rucker October 19, 7 Comments One of the biggest scientific misconceptions that plagues the untrained minds of Christians and non-believers alike is Carbon dating. Many non-believers point to it as evidence that the Bible is untrue. Many Christians shift their worldview to accommodate it scientifically while still reconciling the Biblical telling of Creation.
Both are actually incorrect. It is not a matter of whether the science itself is faulty. The reality is that the science is rather elegant in its function.
Sources. Many works referring to the Pentateuch have been cited throughout the course of this article. We shall here add a list of mainly exegetical works, both ancient and modern, without attempting to give a complete catalogue.
Home Page Biblical Sodom and Gomorrah found! The name of these two cities have long been by-words in our language for wickedness. And many scholars and archaeologists have long searched for the truth about these cities. Fig1 Fig 2 below shows the excavation site of the known traditional location of the “Sanctuary of Lot” in the hills above the indicated site for Zoar.
Fig2 One popular theory for a long time was that the Sodom and Gomorrah were located in the plain south of the Dead Sea and later covered by the waters as the Dead sea water level has changed over time. The level of the waters has receded in recent years and search of the area has located no evidence to verify this location. Searches starting in began to discover evidences of occupied cities in the area southeast of the Dead Sea, most of them located so as to obtain the benefit of water flow from the many Wadi’s of the area.
The map of the proposed locations is shown in Fig 3 below.